Modérateur: Alegas
“If we do our jobs right by making this film a 70 mm event, we will remind people why this is something you can’t see on television and how this is an experience you can’t have when you watch movies in your apartment, your man cave or your iPhone or iPad,” he said. “You’ll see 24 frames per second play out, all these wonderfully painted pictures create the illusion of movement. I’m hoping it’s going to stop the momentum of the digital stuff, and that people will hopefully go, ‘Man, that is going to the movies, and that is worth saving, and we need to see more of that.”
“Now that film has become endangered, and the theatrical experience is become more and more a throwaway, what we could do was go back to the ’60s style, when there were big roadshow productions of big films like The Sand Pebbles, Mutiny On The Bounty, Battle Of The Bulge, or It’s A Mad Mad Mad Mad World, “he said. “There would be an exclusive engagement in 70mm in a big theater or opera house that would play for a month. It felt like a night at the theater or the symphony. Then they would cut it down and it would show up at the theaters and the drive-ins, near you.”
With cinematographer Robert Richardson back to shoot the film, they plan to solely use 65mm film stock and ultra-Panavision lenses that haven’t been used since some of the aforementioned film. Tarantino says this will provide a 2.78:1 ratio, widest possible ratio, and “the biggest widescreen movie shot in the last 40 years.” His goal is to have the 70mm experience exclusively play for two weeks to a month, then roll out in 35mm and “eventually digital.” It sounds like mighty ambitious plans in the current state of exhibition, but if there’s a filmmaker aside from Nolan that has the clout, Tarantino certainly comes to mind.
“I don’t believe you should stay onstage until people are begging you to get off,” he said. “I like the idea of leaving them wanting a bit more. I do think directing is a young man’s game, and I like the idea of an umbilical cord connection from my first to my last movie. I’m not trying to ridicule anyone who thinks differently, but I want to go out while I’m still hard. … I like that I will leave a 10-film filmography, and so I’ve got two more to go after this. It’s not etched in stone, but that is the plan. If I get to the 10th, do a good job and don’t screw it up, well that sounds like a good way to end the old career. If, later on, I come across a good movie, I won’t not do it just because I said I wouldn’t. But 10 and done, leaving them wanting more — that sounds right.”
Alegas a écrit:Pourquoi ne pas le croire sur sa retraite ?
C'est justement l'un des rares à évoquer le sujet, il a bien conscience qu'un grand nombre de ses cinéastes favoris auraient dû arrêter après un certain nombre de films.
Non clairement il a l'air d'avoir assez de recul sur ça pour être vraiment sérieux.
Utilisateurs parcourant ce forum: Aucun utilisateur enregistré et 50 invités