"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
Au fait, qui va écrire une critique de Citizen Kane à part moi ?
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
Bon bah c'est cool, avec un peu de chance on le fera rentrer dans le Top.
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
Ah ouais mais nan là Citizen Kane t'as intérêt à kiffer.
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
Sinon, on fait un double "Challenge-Critique". N'ayant encore vu aucun des 2, je ne sais pas s'il y a moyen de faire une critique comparative sur ces 2 films.