"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
Si, j'avais la VHS étant gamin. Je suis tombé sur le DVD au boulot en promo donc j'ai eu envie de retenter et c'est encore pire que dans mon souvenir...
Disons que face au premier Aladdin, ça pique sévère. Bon, c'est sur que c'était un direct to video, donc pas le même budget. Mais ça n'excuse pas tout...
Oui, le downgrade est ahurissant. C'est hallucinant de voir que Disney, alors en plein nouvel âge d'or, sciait la branche sur laquelle ils étaient assis. L'animation est dégueulasse et l'histoire sans intérêt.