Comme je m'en doutais, le film marche très bien en Chine et fait 23 millions en un weekend, soit la moitié de toute sa carrière US.
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
Francesco en parlait donc je l'ai maté : le très bon débat du Cercle sur le film (à partir de 17:08)
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
"Our films were never intended for a passive audience. There are enough of those kinds of films being made. We wanted our audience to have to work, to have to think, to have to actually participate in order to enjoy them."
Non ils font pas les séries au Cercle. De temps en temps ils font un Cercle consacré aux bouquins en période de rentrée littéraire. Sinon c'est uniquement une sélection sur les sorties ciné. Parfois une rétro quand un vieux film ressort en salle ou en copie remasterisée, souvent c'est Rouyer qui s'y colle à cet exercice (d'ailleurs c'est lui qui enregistre les intros pour les séances de reprise des classiques dans les Gaumont).